| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Boulting v Association of Cinematograph, Television and Allied Technicians ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Boulting v Association of Cinematograph, Television and Allied Technicians
''Boulting v Association of Cinematograph, Television and Allied Technicians'' () 2 QB 606 is a UK labour law and UK company law case from the Court of Appeal. It covers the issue of what it means to act in the best interests of the company, relevant under section 172 of the Companies Act 2006.
==Facts==
Two managing directors of a film company applied for a declaration that while they were performing 'management functions' (e.g. producing and directing) they were not eligible for membership of the trade union (the ACTAT). Until 1950 they had been union members, but then they tore up their cards and paid no further subscriptions. In 1959 the union claimed that they needed to pay up to date for their membership fees, and said they must be members of the union.
At this time, like many unions, there was a closed shop agreement. Rule 7 of the union's rules said that "The association shall consist of all employees engaged on the technical side of film production... including film directors." They also wanted an injunction restraining the union from making them join.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Boulting v Association of Cinematograph, Television and Allied Technicians」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|